cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 frag6.c icmp6.c in6.c in6_ifattach.c in6_pcb.c in6_proto.c in6_rmx.c in6_src.c ip6_input.c ip6_mroute.c ip6_output.c mld6.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c nd6_rtr.c raw_ip6.c udp6_usrreq.c

David O'Brien obrien at freebsd.org
Tue Jan 8 19:32:28 PST 2008


On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:39:11PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien      2008-01-08 19:08:58 UTC
> >
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/netinet6         frag6.c icmp6.c in6.c in6_ifattach.c
> >                          in6_pcb.c in6_proto.c in6_rmx.c in6_src.c
> >                          ip6_input.c ip6_mroute.c ip6_output.c
> >                          mld6.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c nd6_rtr.c
> >                          raw_ip6.c udp6_usrreq.c
> >   Log:
> >   un-__P()
> 
> Do we do that again w/o immediate need and other changes to that file?

I was studying the code.  I don't think its wrong to clean up in that
situation.  Especially since we had un-__P'ing parties in the past (just
for that reason), and we skipped netinet6 to make it easy to sync with
KAME.  gnn declared a while back that we should feel free to make
FreeBSD-specific changes at this point.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)


More information about the cvs-src mailing list