cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 mbuf.9 src/sys/compat/ndis
kern_ndis.c src/sys/dev/cxgb cxgb_sge.c
src/sys/dev/cxgb/ulp/tom cxgb_cpl_socket.c src/sys/dev/hatm
if_hatm_intr.c src/sys/dev/iscsi/initiator isc_soc.c
src/sys/dev/lge if_lge.c ...
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sun Feb 3 10:14:36 PST 2008
In message <20080202004647.D28725 at woozle.rinet.ru>, Dmitry Morozovsky writes:
>On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>PK> No MFC is anticipated.
>Provided current age of 7.* is short enough (and most users of it are aware of
>possible API changes) why don't you think MFC to RELENG_7 is suitable?
If people see a reason for this, and want to take the battle, fine with me.
Given what RELENG_7 has been through already, I'm not going to throw
this particular nit under the wheel, in particular since I still
don't know if the change (via the sendfile SF_SYNC it enables) makes
any difference at all for the Varnish HTTP accellerator which drove
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the cvs-src