cvs commit: src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common dt_cc.c dt_cg.c dt_consume.c

[Sam Leffler]

David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:00:05AM +0000, John Birrell wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:53:57AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:09:19AM +0000, John Birrell wrote:
>>>       
>>>> jb          2008-04-26 05:09:19 UTC
>>>>
>>>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>>>
>>>>   Modified files:
>>>>     cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common dt_cc.c dt_cg.c 
>>>>                                                   dt_consume.c 
>>>>   Log:
>>>>   * Handle the different ioctl design.
>>>>   * Add a couple of FreeBSD action extensions.
>>>>   
>>>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>>>   1.2       +0 -0      src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_cc.c
>>>>   1.2       +0 -0      src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_cg.c
>>>>   1.2       +0 -0      src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_consume.c
>>>>         
>>> John, can you enlighten please why a bunch of your recent commits are +0
>>> -0 changes?  Am I missimg something obvious?
>>>       
>> My reference is the tree from p4. I chose to import that as 1.1.1.1 on
>> the vendor branch and then a second import of the raw OpenSolaris files
>> which will be 1.1.1.2 if they differ from my reference.
>>     
>
> This is back-asswards.  I've offered to help you with the imports - even
> do them for you.  I wish you would have takee me up on it...
> Including giving you 'cvs import -X' behavior.
>
> If I understand correctly, the rev 1.1.1.1 files are the OpenSolaris
> files with changes by you in them?
>
>   
Yes, what he's done appears totally useless.  Not sure how best to 
recover except to rip everything out and start over.

    Sam