cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf f

Constantine A. Murenin cnst at
Mon Oct 15 19:00:12 PDT 2007

On 14/10/2007, M. Warner Losh <imp at> wrote:
> In message: <20071014171922.GA61934 at>
>             Mark Linimon <linimon at> writes:
> : On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 05:14:38PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> : > To write some new code that works inside a sensible architectural
> : > framework that doesn't needlessly push tons of crap into the kernel.
> :
> : I have already written a protest to core about the tone, timing, and
> : public nature of your email.
> :
> : Since this is a) an architectural issue, and b) has already been made
> : inflammatory, I strongly suggest that the issue be handled by core@ and
> : not further argued on this mailing list.
> I didn't find phk's tone all that objectionable, and I also objected
> to the framework going in.  We've certainly had much worse in the
> past.
> : I will not be following this discussion further, pending their intervention.
> I'll not be participating in that discussion, since I have very strong
> objections to the commit that were totally blown off.  Now I have to
> go and look closely to see if any of them were silently corrected
> based on my feedback.

Dear Warner,

I am certainly not aware of any strong objections that you have
regarding any of the work that was part of this commit. Do you mind
sharing any of these very strong objections?


More information about the cvs-src mailing list