cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> writes:
> Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess
> the question is more to Doug than to you.
>
> I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I
> neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended on a threading
> library but a caching nameserver. Going with a port for this
> means supporting the ports infrastructure respectively an extra
> installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done just extra pain;-)
> So far it was easier to go with just base and live with the size of
> named.

I can't imagine a situation where you would want to run BIND but
couldn't spare the disk space for libthr.

Size in kB of named and its dependencies on -CURRENT:

1616 named
1584 libcrypto.so.5
1120 libc.so.7
  80 libthr.so.3

On a production name server, /var/named alone would easily outwheigh
libthr.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no