cvs commit: src/sys/netinet raw_ip.c
Bruce M. Simpson
bms at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 20 13:23:11 UTC 2007
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> We've got interfaces with even larger MTU. Why shouldn't we permit sending
> larger datagrams?
It seems reasonable to be consistent in the amount of send space we
reserve for both SOCK_RAW and SOCK_DGRAM in netinet.
I agree however that this is really the application's problem -- it
should probe for interface MTU and set SO_SENDBUF accordingly, and this
is what I originally told the submitter.
More information about the cvs-src