cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h
obrien at freebsd.org
Mon Aug 27 17:57:43 PDT 2007
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:36:15PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708242252520.15344 at sea.ntplx.net>
> Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org> writes:
> : I guess the build system should be more tolerant of this, but
> : there are bound to be problems regardless. I don't see why
> : the install tools can't also either have their own set of
> : libraries (utilizing LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or be built static.
> There's much resistance to building everything that the build system
> might be used being build static. It adds too much time and
> complexity to the build system, the opponents say.
I've never heard an argument against building these bits static.
What's the issue?
-- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
More information about the cvs-src