cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h

Daniel Eischen deischen at
Mon Aug 27 10:11:53 PDT 2007

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Saturday 25 August 2007 01:06:37 am Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:25:17PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>> I never added symbol versioning to libc in order to solve
>>>> -current upgrade problems.  Sure, you're free to use it that
>>>> way, but it would not make me very happy ;-)
>>> You put it as though symbol versioning is your area of interest and
>>> you just don't want any intruders to tamper with it.  It wouldn't
>>> have seemed so if there had been a well-defined policy on symbol
>>> versioning usage somewhere on
>> No, there isn't a well-defined policy currently, feel free to write it
>> down. :)
> I think I'll write it down when this issue has been settled and I have
> enough input data.  I like writing docs as I have rather poor long-term
> memory and often consult my own texts. :-)

I started a thread on -current for this with a link to my thoughts.


More information about the cvs-src mailing list