cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tip/libacu biz22.c biz31.c courier.c
df.c dn11.c hayes.c t3000.c v3451.c v831.c ventel.c src/usr.bin/tip/tip
Makefile acu.c acutab.c cmds.c cmdtab.c cu.c hunt.c log.c partab.c
remote.c tip.1 tip.c tip.h tipout.c uucplock.c value.c ...
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Fri Sep 1 05:27:54 UTC 2006
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:14:30PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> ru 2006-08-31 14:14:30 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:
>> usr.bin/tip/libacu biz22.c biz31.c courier.c df.c dn11.c
>> hayes.c t3000.c v3451.c v831.c ventel.c
>> usr.bin/tip/tip Makefile acu.c acutab.c cmds.c cmdtab.c
>> cu.c hunt.c log.c partab.c pathnames.h
>> remote.c tip.1 tip.c tip.h tipout.c
>> uucplock.c value.c vars.c
>> Resolve merge conflicts.
> For the curious, I'm working on *really* merging the tip(1) manpage changes,
> and I'll be additionally merging changes to /etc/remote and remote(5) later.
> Recently, I've found several bugs in tip(1). I started fixing them, but
> then I looked at the OpenBSD, and they seemed to have all been fixed. New
> import brings some visible new bugs (when compiled with WARNS=2 for
> example). I'm going to address them as well and send patches back to
> OpenBSD (as well as changes made to manpages).
Are there any noteworthy functional changes in the OpenBSD tip(1)? I guess
tip(1) strikes me as a program unlikely to get significant change over time
(other than cleanup), I'm mostly just curious.
Robert N M Watson
University of Cambridge
More information about the cvs-src