cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile

Garance A Drosehn gad at
Wed Mar 8 10:31:08 PST 2006

At 8:59 AM -0700 3/8/06, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>In message: <20060308150647.GG737 at>
>             Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd at> writes:
>: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>: +>
>: +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9].  The fact that many old Makefiles
>: +> still use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob,
>: +> not a Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and
>: +> USE_FOO in the ports tree).
>: Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN= uses, so it doesn't
>: create confusion?
>Seems like a reasonable thing to do.  Cut and paste copying
>of bad examples is a big source of bogusness in our tree...

If we fix this in some makefiles in -current, should we also
(eventually) MFC the changes back into RELENG_6?  Or is it
only an issue for -current?

Garance Alistair Drosehn     =      gad at
Senior Systems Programmer               or   gad at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;             Troy, NY;  USA

More information about the cvs-src mailing list