cvs commit: src/sys/security/audit audit_arg.c

[Robert Watson]

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Max Laier <max at love2party.net> writes:
>> As this is somewhat vendor code, I think u_int64_t is okay.
>
> On the contrary; u_int*_t is an old BSDism (which we accept for historical 
> reasons), while uint64_t is the correct C99 syntax.

The vendor in this case is/uses an old BSD (Darwin).  Which isn't to say it 
shouldn't be updated, but is actually the case.  Recent Darwin releases 
properly support the newer type names, but older versions don't.  Since we're 
primarily interested in compatibility with recent Darwin, it makes sense to 
update once we've finished the merge.

Robert N M Watson