cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
imp at bsdimp.com
Fri Aug 4 16:18:18 UTC 2006
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:54:14 +0400
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> pdeuskar 2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> P> FreeBSD src repository
> P> Modified files:
> P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> P> Log:
> P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary.
> P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable quickly.
> Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this:
> and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we
> (FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :)
> I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems.
That's what my eyeball of the patch showed.
> I'm only a bit disappointed by the fact, that I haven't received a single
> email about these plans. You were in the void for a long time, and
> then began your work with a commit, w/o informing people who were
> maintaining driver while the vendor maintanance was on a hiatus.
You can blame that last part. Prafulla had sent several versions of
the patch to me for review. I had gotten the mistaken impression that
you were not longer interested in em (which appears to be in error),
so I didn't have him bounce them off of you first. Please accept my
appologies for not suggesting you be in the loop more.
I gave him my signoff on the patch a few hours after you commited to
em, but I didn't notice this until after he'd committed (gotta love
qwest, nuf said). I soon realized my mistake, and would like to offer
a public appology for it.
More information about the cvs-src