cvs commit: src/etc rc.firewall

Hajimu UMEMOTO ume at
Sat Nov 19 07:44:39 GMT 2005


>>>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:34:49 -0800
>>>>> Julian Elischer <julian at> said:

julian> Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

julian> huh?
julian> divert of an ipv6 packet still makes sense!

I don't say that divert of an IPv6 doesn't make sence.  The existing
implementation of both divert and nat cannot handle an IPv6.  So, when
an IPv6 support for ipfw2 is enabled, the line doesn't pass the IPv6


Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at  ume@{,jp.}

More information about the cvs-src mailing list