cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c cp

[Julian Elischer]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Barton wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:27:26PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > des         2004/03/23 14:27:26 PST
> > >
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     usr.bin              Makefile
> > >   Removed files:
> > >     usr.bin/doscmd       AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos
> > ...
> > >   Log:
> > >   Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in the ports tree.
> >
> > Did you *really* have consensus for this??  Several committers said it
> > worked fine and some said they'd like it to remain in /usr/src.
> 
> My recollection of the discussion was something like this:
> 
> 1. Can we remove doscmd from the base and make it a port?
> 2. NO! doscmd works and I use it!
> 3. But we can easily make doscmd a port.
> 4. Oh, well, ok, but maybe we should wait till 6.0?
> 5. At this point, tjr assented to waiting, but others mentioned that if
> we're going to do it, let's do it before 5.3 so that 5-stable looks more
> like what we want it to look.
> 6. I heard no objections to 5.
> 
> My perspective on this might be skewed, since I vote for its removal to
> ports, sooner rather than later, as well.
> 

I think most people heard "tjr assented to waiting" as the end of the
discussion.

remember emails can get re-orderred..


> Doug
> 
> -- 
> 
>     This .signature sanitized for your protection
> 
>