cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s
julian at elischer.org
Tue Apr 27 14:41:17 PDT 2004
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp at bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed?
> It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks.
obviously there were bootblocks befoe that.. I ported teh MACH
bootblocks and one of the things I had to do was to
fiddle with filenames from .s to .S and change the comments to suit.
Gosh that was a long time ago...
> The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C
> (or did I get this the other way around :-)
> > If we have such a convention: yes. I wasn't aware of it.
> > --
> > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> > phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the cvs-src