cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml
olli hauer
ohauer at gmx.de
Wed May 25 00:46:47 UTC 2011
On 2011-05-25 02:32, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 5/24/2011 4:59 PM, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> Unfortunately the package name for apr reflects the build options
>> and we can end up with a view hundred different package names.
>> (5 options * possible (bdb|mysql|pgsql|ldap|sqlite) versions)
> Thats not quite true, I thought I stripped most of this before. If not
> I think we should go head and do so it seems to be more trouble then its
> worth.
A test with "make -V PKGNAME"
machine 1
apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-1.4.5.1.3.12
with all options
apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-ldap24-mysql55-pgsql84-sqlite3-1.4.5.1.3.12
machine 2
apr-nothr-devrandom-1.4.5.1.3.12
apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db47-1.4.5.1.3.12
with all options
apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db47-ndbm-ldap24-mysql55-pgsql90-sqlite3-1.4.5.1.3.12
It has also a good site.
During testbuilds I've logged everything to $PKGNAME.log, so I was able
to see easily what was tested.
Anyway, it's not clear to me why I had no issues to build the the database
wit packaudit on 7.4 but not on a identical 8.2 machine ...
>>
>>
>> So what's the best way to document the apr issue?
>>
>> This entry is not recognized by portaudit and vxquery.
>> <package>
>> <name>apr1</name>
>> <range><lt>1.4.5.1.3.12</lt></range>
>> </package>
>
>
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list