cvs commit: ports/lang/tclX Makefile
Wesley Shields
wxs at atarininja.org
Thu May 3 12:41:44 UTC 2007
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:11:19PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:03:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On 5/3/07, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:40:52AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > >> On 5/3/07, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > >> >On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:57:58PM +0000, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > >> >> mi 2007-05-02 19:57:58 UTC
> > >> >>
> > >> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Modified files:
> > >> >> lang/tclX Makefile
> > >> >> Log:
> > >> >> Work-around the deficiencies in FreeBSD package-building cluster,
> > >> >> which causes the regression-tests to fail by disabling the
> > >regression
> > >> >> tests.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Unbreak -- the build was never "broken" for the usual (non-jail)
> > >> >> systems.
> > >> >
> > >> >Thanks. Just for the record, building in a jail is a supported
> > >> >configuration for all users, so it's something that is required to
> > >> >work for all ports.
> > >>
> > >> So can we please actually write it down somewhere?
> > >
> > >I am not sure of an appropriate place to record this fact.
> > >Suggestions?
> >
> > Anywhere in the Porter's Handbook, naturally. I'll be
> > updating docs this summer, you can probably leave it to
> > me if you don't find this urgent. This thread will
> > remain starred in my inbox until resolved.
>
> Yeah, what I mean is that there doesn't seem to be section as
> currently written that this would be an appropriate addition to.
Not quite the porters handbook but could it not fit in nicely under
section 5.2.2 at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing-ports/maintain-port.html
If it fits in nicely there I can come up with a patch to add it.
-- WXS
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list