cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo

[Mathieu Arnold]

+-le 22/09/2005 20:40 +0200, Anton Berezin écrivait :
| On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
|> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote:
|> > tobez       2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC
|> > 
|> >   FreeBSD ports repository
|> > 
|> >   Modified files:
|> >     databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo 
|> >   Log:
|> >   Update to 1.15.  Require perl from ports.  Assign maintainer to perl at .
|> >   
|> >   Revision  Changes    Path
|> >   1.7       +7 -11     ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile
|> >   1.3       +2 -2      ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo
|> 
|> Just curious...
|> 
|> Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-*
|> ports?
| 
| Not really, it's a matter of personal preference.  I did not feel like
| having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them
| to stay unmaintained, either.  There is, I think, a better chance that
| someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to
| perl@ as opposed to ports at .

In other words, you want them maintained, but not by you ;-)

-- 
Mathieu Arnold