cvs commit: ports MOVED

[Pav Lucistnik]

Ade Lovett píše v so 03. 09. 2005 v 16:09 -0700:

> On Sep 03, 2005, at 15:00 , Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > I did actually built all ports that uses bison before committing this
> > update, and I found single failure, which I handled using bison175  
> > port.
> 
> Which bit of "no sweeping changes before 6.0-RELEASE" was unclear?   

I don't consider this "a sweeping change".

> Bison 2.0 is absolutely not backwards compatible with 1.75 (see all  
> the fun and games with 1.875 as an example).

That's new information for me.

> Right now, the best thing you could do would be to revert the update  
> of devel/bison back to 1.75 then *after* 6.0-RELEASE happens, bring  
> up a devel/bison20, kill off devel/bison (at which point the MOVED  
> entry will work), and manage the upgrade in a more appropriate manner.

Let's see how much will actually break. If it gets bad, it will have to
be backed out, of course.

Still, the MOVED commit is strange.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20050904/03694e99/attachment.bin