cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist

[Adam Weinberger]

>> (03.10.2005 @ 1409 PST): Florent Thoumie said, in 1.2K: <<
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
> >obrien      2005-03-10 19:05:11 UTC
> >
> >  FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >  Modified files:
> >    net/rdesktop         pkg-plist
> >  Log:
> >  Sort the keymaps.
> >
> >  Revision  Changes    Path
> >  1.5       +32 -32    ports/net/rdesktop/pkg-plist
> 
> 	This is your third commit to get rdesktop updated
> 	in two days.
> 
> 	There was a PR pending with a patch included. Maintainer
> 	has been cc'ed.
> 
> 	Please respect ownership when not working on your ports,
> 	or at least wait for maintainer timeout before applying
> 	your changes.
>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist" from Florent Thoumie <<

Sorting the pkg-plist is a trivial change, and was the maintainer's
responsibility in the first place. Asking for maintainer approval
for trivial fixes supports a level of bureaucracy that, while nice
in concept, simple prevents people from applying trivial fixes.

Note that I'm not commenting on David's other commits to rdesktop;
I haven't looked at them. Note also that I do not know what is in
the PR. My only argument here is that committers should not feel
like applying trivial fixes and routine maintenance to the ports
tree amounts to stepping on someone's toes.

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx    ||   adamw at gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx