cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:29:45 -0400
"Dan Langille" <dan at langille.org> wrote:

> On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400
> > "Dan Langille" <dan at langille.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > > 
> > > > obrien      2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > > FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit:
> > 
> >  [ ... ]
> > 
> > Next time I won't bother to make a list then :)
> > 
> > flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to
> > back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides.
> 
> FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit.  Any 
> failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in.  To opt 
> in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at 
> http://www.freshports.org/
> 
> Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available?

IMO yes, users can check against it to help them see if it's something
wrong locally or not (if it's more in real-time that pointyhat INDEX
builds for those building their own INDEX it could help).


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"