cvs commit: ports/audio/arts Makefile

Jacques A. Vidrine nectar at FreeBSD.org
Thu Mar 4 15:00:23 PST 2004


On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:34:11PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> IMO any port that wishes to install a suid binary by default should be
> required to get approval from the FreeBSD Security Team, and their
> decisions, not the port maintainers, be final in cases where it is
> optional. This in addition to any prominent warnings about suid binaries
> deemed necessary.

Well, I'd just be happy to hear from ports maintainers at security-team@
or even freebsd-security at .  I think there is a lot of room for fruitful
discussion in this area, not in the least regarding the appropriate
mechanism to use to implement such `options'.  I will be very happy to
see what Michael comes up with for artswrappers, and for myself I intend
to investigate various X11-related bits that were brought up previously.

After we see what is good for a few test cases, then maybe we would be
ready to add some guidelines to the Porter's Handbook about handling
ports with set-user-ID bits.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar at celabo.org / jvidrine at verio.net / nectar at freebsd.org


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list