cvs commit: ports/security/nessus-devel Makefile distinfo ports/security/nessus-libnasl-devel Makefile distinfo ports/security/nessus-libraries-devel Makefile distinfo ports/security/nessus-plugins-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist

Udo Schweigert freebsd at cert.siemens.de
Thu Dec 4 07:29:35 PST 2003


On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 18:14:12 +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote:
> On 2003-12-04 at 17:41 +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> Now we have two nessus ports (stable and devel) and both 2.0.9?
>> Something wrong?
> 
> It seemed strange to me, too... :-/
> For what it worth, both nessus* and nessus*-devel were at 2.0.8a before
> my commits.
> 
> Let's ask the maintainer - Udo Schweigert (copied).
> I am sure he has certain reasons for this.
> If not, we can remove the devel ports.

Yes, there are reasons. The nessus team has just started a new development
branch, but not yet releases a version out of that.

Here's the developer's announcement:

> Nessus 2.1.x developement has started !
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I am also pleased to announce that the developement of Nessus 2.1.x has
> started, and will eventually result in the release of Nessus 2.2.0 when
> it is ready. Most of the work in Nessus 2.1.x will be (again) devoted
> to improving the performances, reducing the overhead on the tested networks,
> and improve the reporting.

As soon as the first release of the 2.1.x branch is released, both ports will
become different. I maintained both ports so people tracking the -devel ports
always had a working port, instead of being forced to switch to non-devel
during a "non-developing" period.
 

Best regards

--
Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG   | Voice      : +49 89 636 42170
CT IC CERT, Siemens CERT     | Fax        : +49 89 636 41166
D-81730 Muenchen / Germany   | email      : udo.schweigert at siemens.com


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list