cvs commit: doc/es_ES.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports chapter.sgml

[Hiroki Sato]

Vicente Carrasco -Bixen- <carvay at FreeBSD.org> wrote
  in <492456EC.1060805 at FreeBSD.org>:

ca> My point is: in my language (not in DocBook, in my mother thonge)
ca> using <quote> or &laquo; is simply a matter of taste in each moment. I
ca> can't figure why is so important to you. What I can tell you is that
ca> is not so important for me.

 There is a large difference between <quote> and &laquo; even if the
 rendering result is almost the same.  It is not based on my personal
 preference.  From viewpoint of SGML, using &laquo; is wrong.  If you
 need to change the quotation mark, please use more reasonable way to
 do so.

ca> But I find useful the have those two kinds of quotation marks. If I
ca> can use them, why I would use just one?

 I could not read you said the reason why you use &laquo; was you want
 to use two kinds of quotation marks, from the previous email.  I have
 no intention of denying to use two (or more) kinds of quotation marks
 but I object to convert <quote> to &laquo; for that purpose without
 compelling reason.  It is a kind of violation of separation of the
 logical structure and the rendering results, which SGML aims to.

ca> By the way,  I like bikesheds in magenta.

 This is not a bikeshed matter.

--
| Hiroki SATO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc/attachments/20081119/19fbb8dd/attachment.pgp