cvs commit: www/share/sgml header.ent www/en/layout/css layout.css www/en index.xsl

[Marc Fonvieille]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 08:42:06AM +0100, Remko Lodder wrote:
> 
> Hello Robert,
> 
>       Well do notice that I am not against the link itself, I am against
>       the way it was being done. doceng@ is not the proper entity for
>       these kind of things, they coordinate the development of documentation
>       and they assign/accept new commitbits. They cannot be seen as the
>       portmgr@ or core@ teams. The proper way is and should be by contacting
>       the webmasters mailinglist on www@ and ask for the change there. This
>       way the webmasters team can either commit it and/or do additional
>       things.
> 
>       As the "harm" already had been done, we should not remove the link
>       now (esp. with your reasoning), but I request that this will be
>       done the proper way the next time, and we should (www/doc team) really
>       consider some kind of guideline for new links (To avoid the overload
>       of information we once had with the old site).
>

I'm responsible of this situation, mainly cause of the lack of
details in my commit log.  If one wants to blame me, I'm fine with it
cause I committed maybe too quickly.  On another hand, if I have to do
it again, I'd do it in the same manner cause the situation requested a
fast response.  About one week ago or more, Robert pinged doceng
requesting this addition, one person approved the idea and then Robert
asked for help to commit.  This Saturday, I read the mentioned
discussion and I had 3 possibilities:
- ignoring the discussion;
- asking Robert to go on www/doc@ and redo his request etc. (which is
  quite the same as the previous point);
- committing quickly the change.

So according to the Foundation situation, to the discussion with Robert,
to the fact a new thread on www/doc@ would need another week to reach
the same solution, I committed the change.  I really think everyone would
do the same, but once again I apologize for my too short and misleading
commit log.

-- 
Marc