cvs commit: www/en/docproj current.sgml

Tom Rhodes trhodes at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 6 08:38:05 PST 2004


On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:33:22 +0000
Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:26:30AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:29:39 -0800
> > Murray Stokely <murray at freebsdmall.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:50:45AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > > Hmm.  Does that actually buy us anything in the way of maintainability?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I wasn't prepared to make all <h3>'s on our site show up in maroon,
> > > although I probably should have rather than just added the 'red'
> > > classname.
> > > 
> > > I think the intention is for all of them to be maroon, and it's just
> > > an oversight when they show up in default black.  We probably should
> > > remove the class=red from this file, and just make all the h3's show
> > > up in maroon.
> > 
> > Perhaps we should sit down and come up with a valid color scheme
> > which we could all agree on?
> 
> I don't mind.  I've started using blue in my own stuff (e.g.
> http://shrike.submonkey.net/~ceri/doc/articles/dns-primer/) which I
> think looks nicer than red, but that's a real bikeshed for now.
> 
> The real thing to get sorted is to get everything factored out into a
> stylesheet somewhere, and then we can come up with individual
> stylesheets and argue about them when we have a chance of making them
> work properly.

Very true, I'll shut up on the issue now as I really don't
care much whether the color is red, blue, black, green, etc.  :)

-- 
Tom Rhodes


More information about the cvs-doc mailing list