cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml

[Christian Brueffer]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:26:41AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:59:24PM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> > > Mainly I'm quoting the OpenSSL stuff, and I think some parts of the
> > > handbook use `IPSec' also.  However, I'm not going to fight with
> > > anyone, as the majority of our sources do, in fact use the lower
> > > case `s'.  Otherwise I'm not going to drag this on.  Back to my
> > > studies.
> > > 
> > > And yes, before someone points it out, my analysis of `sources'
> > > was incorrect, but I can almost swear it was IPSec in the NOTES
> > > file...  Perhaps I need more sleep.
> 
> > As long as we're consistent, we should be okay.
> 
> Agreed; I've explicitly cc'd blackend on this mail, as he has previously
> done a sweep.  Since we've already done one, as long as this change moves
> to the same standard then it's ok.
> 
> Once that's decided then our choice needs adding to the word list, as
> murray stated.
> 

Sorry for diving into the discussion at such a late state, I was out of town
over the weekend.

I don't really care which capitalization we use, it was just a consistency
change.  IPsec seems to be the preferred capitalization, so I stuck with
that.

So the essence of the discussion is to stick with IPsec, or did I miss
something?
I'll add an entry to the wordlist then.

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris at unixpages.org	brueffer at FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc/attachments/20030417/4915640b/attachment.bin