cvs commit: ports/archivers/p5-PerlIO-gzip Makefile ports/archivers/p5-PerlIO-via-Bzip2 Makefile ports/comms/p5-Device-SerialPort Makefile ports/converters/p5-Text-Iconv Makefile ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached-XS Makefile ports/databases/p5-C

[Doug Barton]

On 05/07/2012 12:47, Chris Rees wrote:
> 
> On 7 May 2012 20:15, "Doug Barton" <dougb at freebsd.org
> <mailto:dougb at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 08:42, Sergey Skvortsov wrote:
>> >   Pass maintainership of almost of my "p5-*" ports to "perl@".
>> >
>> >   (I hope updating of them will be improved).
>>
>> Did you discuss this with anyone from perl@? The list should not be used
>> as a dumping ground for unloved p5-* ports. It may have been better to
>> pass these to ports@ instead.
>>
> 
> I'd rather have them in perl@ than ports@; it means anyone is allowed to
> update them rather than messing with approval etc.  Note that Sergey
> didn't say he wouldn't update them again (or imply it IMO)

I don't understand your answer. MAINTAINER= ports@ means that anyone can
update them. Traditionally, MAINTAINER= perl@ means that a specific
group of people have accepted responsibility for maintenance.

If you're saying, as part of the perl@ team, that this policy has
changed, so be it.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection