[ports] cvs commit: ports/devel/glui Makefile ports/devel/glui/files patch-makefile

Ion-Mihai Tetcu itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Fri Dec 2 20:39:25 UTC 2011


On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:29:50 +0000
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:48:22 +0000
> > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > While normally, since both old and new packages have correct
> > > pkg-list, bumping PORTREVISION is not necessary, in this case it
> > > might be required if this is dependent port, and consumers might
> > > want to link to newly installed shared library (that is, if
> > > previously installed version would not work).
> > 
> > It is necessary to bump it, to get the package rebuilt on pointy.
> 
> Could be, although I thought that our build cluster routinely
> rebuilds all the packages regardless of updates thereof.

No, that only happens when we do a full build == build all ports. We
usually only do incremental builds == build ports with PKGVERSION
bigger that their existing package.

> Even in your scenario, rebuild should benefit (affect) dependent
> packages, and this particular case I had explicitly mentioned.
> 
> To be safe, one can bump port revision if plist changes even if it was
> previously correct;

Yes.

> however, I have not seen technical proof that it should always be
> done, but I of course could be wrong.  As an edge case, why bump port
> revision for a leaf port, if pkg-plist was previously correct and new
> files do not change port's behavior (read: bring no visible changes
> to users or their vast majority), especially when the rebuild is very
> time consuming?

Hard to know what "vast majority" is exactly :)

(The current rule is to bump when the plist would change if the port is
built with defaults)

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20111202/7aa62e06/signature.pgp


More information about the cvs-all mailing list