cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in

[Doug Barton]

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
>>> was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS...
>> There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port 
>> to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log for 
>> more information on why.
> 
> That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports
> have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their
> Makefile in FreeBSD ports?
> 
> Why would this be needed for portmaster? 

Why do you care?

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection