cvs commit: ports/deskutils/basket Makefile ports/security/gnutls Makefile ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/libotr Makefile ports/security/libgcrypt Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libksba ...

Jean-Yves Lefort jylefort at FreeBSD.org
Fri Mar 9 21:41:52 UTC 2007


On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:13:27 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:50:35 -0600, Jean-Yves Lefort
> <jylefort at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:29:20 -0600
> > "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:31:11 -0600, Kent Stewart <kstewart at owt.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thursday 08 March 2007 06:12, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
> >> >> jylefort    2007-03-08 14:12:08 UTC
> >> >>
> >> >>   FreeBSD ports repository
> >> >>
> >> >>   Modified files:
> >> >>     deskutils/basket     Makefile
> >> >>     security/gnutls      Makefile
> >> >>     security/dirmngr     Makefile
> >> >>     security/libotr      Makefile
> >> >>     security/libgcrypt   Makefile
> >> >>     security/gnupg       Makefile
> >> >>     security/gpgme       Makefile
> >> >>     security/libksba     Makefile
> >> >>     security/gnutls-devel Makefile
> >> >>   Log:
> >> >>   Track libgpg-error shlib version change.
> >> >
> >> > There were more than this. For example, kde's kmail no longer runs
> >> > because it is looking for libgpg-error.so.3. If I look at the ports
> >> > that use this library there must be 20-30 on my computer.
> >>
> >> In the past, I have requested to add in UPDATING so it will be need to
> >> do
> >> that again too.
> >>
> >> http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/cvs-all_2006/msg37160.html
> >>
> >> portupgrade -rf libgpg-error-\*
> >
> > Ok I know what's going on. You need the -f because of the issue
> > described in ports/104877. Otherwise a mere "portupgrade -a" or
> > "portupgrade -r libgpg-error" would catch the revision bumps and
> > rebuild the appropriate ports.
>
> The 'portupgrade -a or -r' will not catch it.

I did not say "will", I said "would" (if 104877 was fixed).

> The libsoup, evolution, buoh, and etc still need to be bump. These
> ports don't have any of libgpg-error dependency in the Makefile.

These indirect clients should not link against libgpg-error. They only
do so because of a bug in libtool.

> # ldd /usr/local/lib/libsoup-2.2.so.8 | grep libgpg-error
>          libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x28541000)
> # ldd /usr/local/bin/buoh | grep libgpg-error
>          libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x28176000)
> # ldd /usr/local/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-calendar.so |
> grep libgpg-error
>          libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x297c3000)
> [...goes on...]
>
> I sloved this problem by 'portmaster -r libgpg-error-\*'. So... Add
> 'portupgrade -rf libgpg-error-\*' and 'portmaster -r libgpg-error-\*' in
> UPDATING will taking care of it.

I'd rather have 104877 fixed. Rebuilding most of your ports because a
small library down the tree was updated is not acceptable.

--
Jean-Yves Lefort

jylefort at FreeBSD.org
http://lefort.be.eu.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20070309/891851e1/attachment.pgp


More information about the cvs-all mailing list