cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:19 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (12.24.2005 @ 1605 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.5K: <<
> > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:01 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > >> (12.24.2005 @ 1204 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.0K: <<
> > > > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:55 +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > > adamw       2005-12-24 16:55:31 UTC
> > > > > 
> > > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Modified files:
> > > > >     devel/libsoup        Makefile 
> > > > >   Log:
> > > > >   Add PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS to CONFIGURE_ENV, and make LDFLAGS actually
> > > > >   be a part of CONFIGURE_ENV.
> > > > 
> > > > You have to treat LDFLAGS specially because of OpenSSL.  Also, we really
> > > > need Ade to look into this libtool problem.  We shouldn't have to hack
> > > > all of these ports when it seems pretty clear the new libtool is at
> > > > fault here.
> > > >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
> > > 
> > > w0rd. I've backed it out and put LDFLAGS back where it belongs. Should
> > > it be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV though?
> > 
> > No.  bsd.openssl.mk takes care of that for us.
> > 
> > Joe
> >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
> 
> Hrmmn. I'm pretty sure that when I added ${PTHREAD_LIBS} to that
> LDFLAGS line, it didn't get passed to configure. At least, the
> build still failed anyway.

Ah, nevermind.  I see we've yanked out OpenSSL in favor of GnuTLS.
Therefore, we will have to revert to handling LDFLAGS ourselves.  Sorry
for the confusion.

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20051224/d8237cd3/attachment.bin