cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha vm_machdep.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 vm_machdep.c src/sys/i386/i386 vm_machdep.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 vm_machdep.c src/sys/powerpc/powerpc vm_machdep.c

Sam Leffler sam at errno.com
Sat Dec 27 18:21:12 PST 2003


On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:03 pm, Sam Leffler wrote:
> On Saturday 27 December 2003 05:56 pm, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > > >   Move the declaration of sfbufspeak and sfbufsused to mbuf.h,
> > > >   and use imax instead of max, as sfbufspeak and sfbufsused
> > > >   are signed.
> > >
> > > These have nothing to do with mbufs; why move the decls to mbuf.h?
> > >
> > > 	Sam
> >
> > Because I can't think of anywhere else sendfile related values would fit.
> > So far our only use of sfbufs in the system is to attach them to mbufs
> > and send them out via sockets.  FWIW, I'm about to overload mbstat with
> > some sendfile statistics as well, because I can't think of another place
> > that they would fit well.  I'm open to ideas, as long as they don't
> > involve creating yet another header file.
>
> Looks like there's an sf_buf.h.  If that's not to your liking perhaps
> systm.h or kernel.h.  Please don't pollute mbuf.h.

Looks like this stuff had already landed in subr_mbuf.c so I guess mbuf.h 
makes sense.  Sure wish this stuff had been kept separate; it doesn't make 
sense to me that it's being tossed in to the mbuf code.

	Sam



More information about the cvs-all mailing list