cvs commit: src/libexec/talkd announce.c extern.h print.ctable.c
 talkd.c
    Bruce Evans 
    bde at zeta.org.au
       
    Fri Apr  4 02:10:42 PST 2003
    
    
  
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:53:50AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > -.  if ${WARNS} > 4
> > +.  if ${WARNS} > 4 && !empty(CFLAGS:M-O*) && empty(CFLAGS:M-O0)
> >  CFLAGS		+=	-Wuninitialized
> >  .  endif
>
> Why not just get rid of it totally?  We have this already:
It's too useful to remove totally.
>     .  if ${WARNS} > 1 && ${WARNS} < 5
>     # XXX Delete -Wuninitialized by default for now -- the compiler doesn't
>     # XXX always get it right.
>     CFLAGS      +=  -Wno-uninitialized
>     .  endif
>
> so we already know it is problematic.  OR rather than use:
>
>     .  if ${WARNS} > 4
>     CFLAGS      +=  -Wuninitialized
>     .  endif
>
> use
>
>     .  if ${WARNS} == 4
>     CFLAGS      +=  -Wuninitialized
>     .  endif
Add -Wno-uninitialized to cancel -Wuninitialized being part of -Wall as
necessary, i.e., if -Wall is added (${WARNS} > 1) but -O is not in ${CFLAGS}.
Don't add it or change WARNS settings back and forth to work around bitrot
from -Wuninitialized not being turned off for so long.  Don't change sources
"to keep gcc happy".
Bruce
    
    
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list