ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system?
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Mon Oct 22 21:32:40 UTC 2018
> From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg at pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > --------
> > In message <CANCZdfrMfEZxjwZGQZA6qEbZOm=91GKa8xweZwSUs-+iTeUUTA at mail.gmail.com>
> > , Warner Losh writes:
> > >> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ?
> > >>
> > >> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells,
> > >> confirmed that is who I saw with ctm usage.
> > >
> > >Do we need it in base? Or can we make it a port?
> > Absolutely make it a port!
> I concur, but please hold off on the svn rm until
> Stephen Montgomery and Julian have acked that they
> can quickly and easily transition to a port, then
> I would even be fine with a MFC gone in(13) to
> stable/12 and an immediate rm from head.
I dont foresee a problem if its moved to ports.
( Unusual, as I often do predict problems moving to ports/ )
Let's wait for Stephen's thoughts, & other ctm users.
Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich.
Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU.
Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref.
More information about the ctm-users