From nobody Sat Jun 26 01:54:21 2021 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E200A11D9635 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GBcP85pflz4S47 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B13AC1615D for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15Q1sKcw099423 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 15Q1sKxj099422 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233324] x11/libX11: Remove unnecessary perl5 dependency Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:54:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233324 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #10) There seems to be some kind of misunderstanding that would best be fixed by anyone wanting to have an opinion looking at the software's build process a= nd artifacts before commenting further. jbeich did this for swills and the ticket was ignored for a year. As a nat= ive English speaker what Jan said makes clear sense to me and he is not saying anywhere the patch is incorrect. Instead it's uncontroversial evidence the dependency is frivolous in our build. He also documented his approach, whi= ch is a better way to progress PRs like this: rg is ripgrep which is a life changing tool for developers and maintainers. Try it, it's great. (In reply to Michael Gmelin from comment #12) The port as it stands will never run 'make check', a specific bsd.port.mk feature would be needed to hit a target like that and it is not present.=20 Again, jbeich clearly documented the lack of use so the only issues are imagined and not factual. There's no disrespect, it's getting the job done if there's a trivial PR th= is old without followup and a correct fix with multiple developer's eyes on it. Time to move on there are much bigger fish to fry and this patch was integr= al from the beginning. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=