Re: Request for architectural review: experimental net80211/LinuxKPI HE station support

On Fri, 6 Nov 2026, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> It's mostly telling that early up I gotta figure out really why the locking
> is showing up in the he state in the node and if so, maybe I should go
> create a formal node lock for node state and mark it appropriately.

No!  Please not more of a mess.


> I'm also going to review the he definitions it brought into the header
> files as the first pass to see what's good as is, what needs tweaking and
> how it intersects with the rest of linuxkpi.

All definitions used by LinuxKPI based wireless drivers that compiled at some
point are in there.  If we need to fill gaps then that is most likely due to
the fact that we want them in the mgmt code to handle other cases (fields,
flags, ..) for the fullness of spec.  But that is then likely easily done
along with writing such code as needed and the spec next to it.



-- 
For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew
great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall
deceive the very elect. Behold, I have told you before. [Mat. 24:24-25]