Re: Poor performance on 11ac
- Reply: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: Poor performance on 11ac"
- In reply to: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: Poor performance on 11ac"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 07:24:42 UTC
Curiously I rebooted and it went back to normal speed. Kind regards Ben On 7/18/25 00:35, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025, Ben Hutton wrote: > >> The Access point is in AU mode. > > Then set country AU on FreeBSD too. > >> compat.linuxkpi.80211.wlan0.dump_stas: >> lsta 0xfffff8004d54e800 sta 0xfffff8004d54e9c0 added_to_drv 1 >> nl80211_sta_info (valid fields) >> 0x00004503<BEACON_RX,BEACON_SIGNAL_AVG,SIGNAL_AVG,RX_BITRATE,TX_BITRATE> >> connected_time 0 inactive_time 0 >> rx_bytes 0 rx_packets 0 rx_dropped_misc 0 >> rx_duration 0 rx_beacon 17392 rx_beacon_signal_avg -62 >> tx_bytes 0 tx_packets 0 tx_failed 0 >> tx_duration 0 tx_retries 0 >> signal 0 signal_avg -60 ack_signal 0 avg_ack_signal 0 >> generation 0 assoc_req_ies_len 0 chains 0 >> rxrate: flags 2<VHT_MCS> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 6 nss 2 >> he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_gi 0 >> txrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2 >> he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_gi 0 > > This doesn't look too bad. VHT80 MCS 9 NSS 2 for tx doesn't get any > better. > > >> I'm running main. > > Hmm, the only thing I had done there was fix installer, fix regdomain > for ETSI, and the ACPI changes beginning of the month (Jul 4). > > Would be interesting to know if others are seeing similar problems? >