From nobody Fri Feb 28 23:52:37 2025 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4Q4S5Xrfz59Wdd for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from che@bein.link) Received: from mail.bein.link (bein.link [37.252.124.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4Q4S0Kl4z468C; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from che@bein.link) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bein.link header.s=mail header.b=ANsAWP17; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of che@bein.link has no SPF policy when checking 37.252.124.82) smtp.mailfrom=che@bein.link Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [90.156.160.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bein.link (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2806C238384; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <12cd6fe8-f8e0-4eb2-8373-c51d30ae4da9@bein.link> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 04:52:37 +0500 List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: HT and VHT testing for modern iwlwifi chipsets (notes about others) From: Maxim V Filimonov To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: FreeBSD wireless mailing list References: <0r8nrq32-4980-r724-9snp-p9pqp2o50650@SerrOFQ.bet> <6376pqp6-2930-76s2-93nr-n709q8106qs3@SerrOFQ.bet> <67cb2ca8-4739-401f-bfb8-72820856d51c@bein.link> <67684abc-f8b4-4be7-8b00-20fbe9a5203a@bein.link> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <67684abc-f8b4-4be7-8b00-20fbe9a5203a@bein.link> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bein.link; s=mail; t=1740786711; bh=BYCxm/o0tI45WWJ4brW0RS651E4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ANsAWP17AlIKrI3M/nr4xbio+f7je1iBtj9cKylb20ltavsCZWQjaS3b9cjorNwp5ssqXSZa/h65aLBWStoD+phcuH4uqYGeD90+vRI1suniG1eMrc0dyrJMAG1CK8OxA2P7Az4UUGIYUWPW8EAQCLRj8OyCH9H2FrlhR0krJfo= X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.84 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.91)[-0.912]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.849]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bein.link:s=mail]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:196752, ipnet:37.252.120.0/21, country:NL]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bein.link]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[wireless@FreeBSD.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bein.link:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4Q4S0Kl4z468C X-Spamd-Bar: -- In short, wpa_supplicant is complaining about wrong key: "the psk may be wrong" On 01.03.2025 04:51, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > Bjoern, > > After I pasted the ac tunable name correctly, I was no longer able to > connect to 5GHz. Which outputs should I collect when I try that again? > > On 01.03.2025 04:25, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Sat, 1 Mar 2025, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: >> >>> The funny thing is, after I set the country to what the router says, >>> it did connect, but ifconfig still says it's 802.11a. However, the >>> speed greatly >> >> ifconfig as attached in the log says: >> >>         ssid libastral channel 36 (5180 MHz 11a ht/40+) bssid >> 2c:c8:1b:c1:8d:d0 >> >> ht/40+ >> >>         -pureg protmode CTS ht htcompat -ampdutx ampdurx ampdulimit 64k >> >> ht is on (no minus in front) >> >>         media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11na >> >> and you are on MCS mode 11na >> >> >> That is all as expected for 11n. >> >> >>> improved: it now shows 90+ Mbps instead of the 10 I saw before. >>> >>> So probably, I don't have the problem I've originally reported. >>> >>> Still, ac doesn't seem to be on, tho. >> >> The tunable doesn't get unset by anything if set correctly at boot time. >> Maybe double check there is no typo or copy&paste problem? You can >> use the >> name from the sysctl to be sure. >> >> Bjoern >> -- wbr, Maxim Filimonov