Re: bhyve passthru problem
- Reply: Oleksandr Kryvulia : "Re: bhyve passthru problem"
- In reply to: Oleksandr Kryvulia : "Re: bhyve passthru problem"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:47:43 UTC
Ciao Oleksandr. I can't produce patches,I'm not a programmer. But I conduct experiments every day,changing parameters,system files between different FreeBSD versions,operating systems and tools. Can't you use virtio-net instead of passing through the physical network interface,like this for example : -s 13,virtio-net,tap18 \ in your bhyve guest ? You can try these bhyve versions : (try both) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/14OMOjdyS5NPQ75ISatcpCWegU0udzG0r?usp=sharing On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 9:17 AM Oleksandr Kryvulia <shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua> wrote: > 14.06.24 10:50, Peter Grehan: > >> I don't know why bhyve validates the BAR size. The commit adding this > >> check is old [1] and doesn't explain it. What bhyve could do is > >> rounding up the BAR size to a full page size when allocating memory for > >> the BAR. > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd- > >> src/commit/7a902ec0eccc752c9c38533ed123121eaaea1225 > > > > At the time, BIOSs would often place device BARs of less than a page > > size in the same physical page. Since EPT only gives page granularity, > > this would result in all those devices being available to the guest > > even if they hadn't been passed through. > > > Peter, can you explain how can I use this device in a guest without > passing through? > > > -- Mario.