Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

---> BTW, I think what you are saying already exists and macOS is exactly
that: the FreeBSD core and the mach microkernel.

Please don't compare FreeBSD to MacOS.

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Alejandro,I'm not sure if you are aware that the discussion at a certain
>> point has broadened and deepened. I don't understand why I can't propose
>> an alternative to the actual jail and jail managers that you are talking
>> about. And no. On the L4 website there is a userland based on new versions
>> of Ubuntu and Debian that can be used with the microkernel offered. They
>> also say that FreeBSD can be compiled,too,using the same technique used to
>> build the Linux userland proposed. If you want to talk about containers,why
>> not also add the microkernel topic,that's not a container,but its working
>> can be compared to the microservices offered by Linux and FreeBSD if they
>> run with a microkernel.
>>
>>
> Never said you can't propose it, it just seems off-topic to this thread.
> Maybe start a new thread on microkernel versus X.
> This thread is about containers and container configuration, auto-scaling,
> discovery, updating and monitoring, etc.
>
> What I usually do in this case is start a new thread with a new subject
> and (was: xxx).
> That way, people interested in that branch of the discussion can continue
> on its own topic, and the mail archives can do a better job for later
> research.
>
> BTW, I think what you are saying already exists and macOS is exactly that:
> the FreeBSD core and the mach microkernel.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Alex
>


-- 
Mario.