Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

Reply: Paul Vixie : "Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?"
In reply to: Mario Marietto : "Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Alejandro Imass <aimass_at_yabarana.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 15:18:50 UTC

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:05 PM Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com>
wrote:

> ---> I understand that Linux native containers can already run on BSD with
> the Linuxulator layer.
>
> Docker can't run on the linuxulator. Curious to see if kubernetes and or
> runj do it. Me too I know that native code is better,but I know that no one
> on FreeBSD wants,so instead of using bhyve,if I can,I prefer the lighter
> Linuxulator.
>

Well, it has run in the past: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Docker

But I don't think anyone really wants Docker and there's the hypervisor for
that. The intent of the thread is to deliberate on native freebsd
orchestration and autoscaling.
I don't think anyone would mind re-writing Dockerfile to Bastillefile or
whatever. What's missing is the other part, the k8s equivalent.