From nobody Mon Aug 16 18:18:27 2021 X-Original-To: virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E38E175984C for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 18:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ctuffli@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com (mail-ej1-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GpMqV3TK6z4vgH for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 18:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ctuffli@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id b15so33355801ejg.10 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A1d8RYUWpstqweLX91aCw2stVENRCBXQOs8vGSt8iLQ=; b=Ui+C7ADuFhfoSkounhEjTlqwghzD4RmtrvWnGw2ty6ZyKqxcGgH/blvACz0WhF2evp p2GgJIjtNYjPAgIk8aeL/B4Y89TXfc0KD8SRuA5Ol3SDj96xq4IPQY+mxELR2P6Ruaru rqn+hujTIuloNRCEI7iM8HGPWRTQTHaTOummBWG2jElMRAmAWAKf7wH+8kIKEfbCJDH+ HcAnCaJxEGmK75QoZLeqPYP4fWOdO3JvlwuCae33SiIcOC6z2h2YdMFbGaMxnAN4qJC8 K0xWhcs87ot3ILvR5ZYtoTqGVoyTeSMC/d9VwaI4DvpmT4BjJfw7DrZV7evMZmoUIGNO iGaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533s5Ihuo6y5/eYQEg9YQ5DQQ0+MyAUN+nfRSehCSEEn/+1f7c1U y87ZEp+UoFfM0vELr2G8TmZShD2QsSae6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCK4h2pAXRMb8RFMkEbTJ8Hqh8jj8SPh1DClmtKJNt/sFLxTPJVpmfp7TOyPgaDW9AmIGQcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c246:: with SMTP id bl6mr11857721ejb.80.1629137919299; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com. [209.85.208.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm5233480edp.61.2021.08.16.11.18.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so27802256edx.8 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:104b:: with SMTP id e11mr21945736edu.62.1629137918448; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:38 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Chuck Tuffli Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:18:27 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 256422] bhyve and Centos/Rocky 8.4 no boot after install To: John Kennedy Cc: virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GpMqV3TK6z4vgH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:30 AM John Kennedy wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:23:10PM +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256422 > > > > --- Comment #15 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- > > A commit in branch main references this bug: > > > > URL: > > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=91064841d72b285a146a3f1c32cb447251e062ea > > > > commit 91064841d72b285a146a3f1c32cb447251e062ea > > Author: Chuck Tuffli > > AuthorDate: 2021-06-27 22:14:52 +0000 > > Commit: Chuck Tuffli > > CommitDate: 2021-06-27 22:14:52 +0000 > > > > bhyve: Fix NVMe iovec construction for large IOs > ... > > PR: 256422 > > Reported by: dave@syix.com > > Tested by: jason@tubnor.net > > MFC after: 5 days > > Relnotes: yes > > Reviewed by: imp, grehan > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30897 > > > > usr.sbin/bhyve/pci_nvme.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Is there any reason not to merge that into releng/13.0? Adding this patch against 13.0-RELEASE-p3 fixed my issues with OEL8 (and presumably RHEL8). No, this would be really good to get into releng/13, but this isn't something I've done before. Let me find out what's involved. --chuck