[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264949] lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp consumption"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:54:48 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264949
Bug ID: 264949
Summary: lang/gcc11: Needs build time warning for /tmp
consumption
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp
Assignee: toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(toolchain@FreeBSD.org)
lang/gcc11 is now the default version of gcc at ports git
cad2f66a384d74cffa870d978722e6fd579c7d2f.
On updating, build exhausted by insufficient capacity of /tmp.
At the moment, I had 2GiB of tmpfs for /tmp, backed with 32GiB swap.
stable13 at git dac438a9b599cfec13b463a1a8d90283f7ed830f, amd64.
By increasing /tmp with 1GiB step (with reboots), finally build finished
successfully with 5GiB of/tmp. (4GiB was insufficient.)
I'm not sure this is really reasonable for just a toolchain though, at least,
this SHALL be warned like www/chromium does on pre-everything:: target does.
Is this because of LTO_BOOTSTRAP option (default of amd64)?
Note that /tmp was used only 1.7MiB after building lang/gcc11 finished
and lang/gcc10 with default option was OK with 2GiB of /tmp.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.