Re: kern.msgbuf_show_timestamp=1

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 7:16 AM Mark Linimon <linimon@portsmon.org> wrote:

> > On 01/23/2026 3:21 AM CST Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
> wrote:
> > I think opening review on Phabricator alone is easily missed.
> > So I basically file a PR on Bugzilla, open review and introduce
> > the D number of the review on Bugzilla PR.
>
> IMHO the fact that we make our developers jump through these hoops
> is proof our tooling is wrong.
>

Yes. 100% agreed. It's the tooling we have. It's not the tooling we want.
there are too many hoops.


> Other than duplicating work, he biggest problem with the workflow
> above is that Someone (TM) needs to go through the Problem Reports
> looking for references to completed DR.


Yes. Also a flaw. It's also why we need to strongly say 'do not duplicate'
because
It causes nothing but extra work for us and has limited value.

Warner