Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?
- In reply to: Sulev-Madis Silber : "Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:43:44 UTC
On 9/16/25 18:10, Sulev-Madis Silber wrote: > On September 17, 2025 3:27:58 AM GMT+03:00, Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> wrote: >> Yes. "memstick" contains exactly the same bits as "disc1" -- the only >> difference is how it boots. And for that matter, any modern system should >> work just fine with the "disc1" image on a USB disk; we might get rid of >> "memstick" in 16 since it's pointless duplication. > > that would mean that people who sometimes slightly modify installers now need to make their own custom full installer images? > at minimum one needs to extract it > > maybe not even bad i think... > > but i'm surprised that it's memstick that goes first and not discs. except longer shelf life (nearly forever if you press it) and being physically readonly, i don't know how many installs are done from *actual* cd(-r) / dvd(-r). sometimes you don't even have reader nor writer nor blanks. MODERN hw, right? The name "disc1" is historical. It doesn't even fit on a CD any more. (We do try to make sure the "dvd" image fits on a DVD, though.) Most installs should using the "disc1" image on a memory stick. Basically, "disc1" should work on a memory stick but "memstick" doesn't work on optical media. So we should keep the option which works everywhere. -- Colin Percival FreeBSD Release Engineering Lead & EC2 platform maintainer Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid