Re: FreeBSD-set-src package is marked as vital?

i would like to report it but I wanted to gather opinions on the matter of FreeBSD-set-src being marked as vital first
-------- Original Message --------
On Friday, 10/17/25 at 06:40 Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote:

> (Reduced to the maximum of two lists)
>
> On 16/10/2025 19:20, polyduekes@proton.me wrote:
>
>> … the "1 missing" really confused me, if it wasn't for a helpful guy from the community i wouldn't have figured out that the issue was that "FreeBSD-set-src" is marked as vital, so i think it would really helpful if it is possible that pkg can tell that instead of saying "1 missing"
>
> +1
>
> [<https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001550.html>](https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001550.html), [<https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001553.html>](https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001553.html)
>
>> Understanding vital with version 2.2.2 of pkg in FreeBSD 16.0-CURRENT (1600000)
>
> polyduekes, I should recommend adding the issue to GitHub, if it's not already there (I don't see it).
>
> [<https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues?q=is:issue%20is:open%20sort:updated-desc>](https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc)