Re: Which version is BOOTX64.efi?

From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 01:11:06 UTC
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 16:45:15 -0700
"Mel P." <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote:

> On 2025-08-30 16:34, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:49:49 -0600
> > Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025, 7:12 AM Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is why I previously commented with git hash and/or n number.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is harder and introduces a git dependency to the loader process. The
> >> kernel has this, true. And hg, svn, gitup and a few others. It's a mess
> >> that I'd rather not have since the loader is built a dozen times, not once
> >> like the kernel, and any slowdown when one of the above scms misbehaves is
> >> greater.
> >>
> >> Warner
> > 
> > Yeah, precisely determining what read-incompatible features is/are
> > enabled (whitelisted) is the key point for the bootcodes / loaders.
> > 
> > Using date/time, ancient method was (IIRC) the date/time the bootcodes
> > / loaders are "built", NOT "committed to master repo".
> > 
> > Obtaining the actually wanted date / time needs git functionality
> > in current form, thus, heavy-weighted for bootcodes / loaders.
> 
> Just have it store the whitelist in a retrievable format.  Provide the 
> information directly.

The whitelist would be this.

  https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/stand/libsa/zfs/zfsimpl.c#n109

Note that it includes only read-incompatible features supported.
So seeing this alone could confuse like "Isn't feature xxx supported?
Should I re-create pool without the (read-compatible) feature xxx?!".

The comment in the file is clear enough for me, but what about for
someone just started learning about ZFS?

To know features including read-compatible ones that are "enabled"
by default ("active" is another thing), we need to understand
in what state the whole ZFS codes are when the bootcode / loader
is built. And this require to specify the commit the build is
done at.

Warner, please correct me if I'm mis-understanding.
I believe you're the best person who knows correctly in loader area.

-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>