Re: main [and, likely, stable/14]: do not set vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled=1 with that zpool feature enabled because it still leads to panics
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: main [and, likely, stable/14]: do not set vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled=1 with that zpool feature enabled because it still leads to panics"
- In reply to: Alexander Motin : "Re: main [and, likely, stable/14]: do not set vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled=1 with that zpool feature enabled because it still leads to panics"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 22:30:41 UTC
Hi Alexander, I can confirm that the patch fixes the panic caused by the provided script on my test systems. Mark, would it be possible to try poudriere on your system with a patched kernel? Thanks mm On 9. 9. 2023 0:09, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 08.09.2023 09:52, Martin Matuska wrote: >> I digged a little and was able to reproduce the panic without >> poudriere with a shell script. >> >> #!/bin/sh >> nl=' >> ' >> sed_script=s/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa/bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb/ >> >> for ac_i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7; do >> sed_script="$sed_script$nl$sed_script" >> done >> echo "$sed_script" 2>/dev/null | sed 99q >conftest.sed >> >> repeats=8 >> count=0 >> echo -n 0123456789 >"conftest.in" >> while : >> do >> cat "conftest.in" "conftest.in" >"conftest.tmp" >> mv "conftest.tmp" "conftest.in" >> cp "conftest.in" "conftest.nl" >> echo '' >> "conftest.nl" >> sed -f conftest.sed < "conftest.nl" >"conftest.out" 2>/dev/null >> || break >> diff "conftest.out" "conftest.nl" >/dev/null 2>&1 || break >> count=$(($count + 1)) >> echo "count: $count" >> # 10*(2^10) chars as input seems more than enough >> test $count -gt $repeats && break >> done >> rm -f conftest.in conftest.tmp conftest.nl conftest.out > > Thank you, Martin. I was able to reproduce the issue with your script > and found the cause. > > I first though the issue is triggered by the `cp`, but it appeared to > be triggered by `cat`. It also got copy_file_range() support, but > later than `cp`. That is probably why it slipped through testing. > This patch fixes it for me: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15251 . > > Mark, could you please try the patch? >