Re: routing changes from Sept 7th and possible ppp breakage (RELENG_13)

On 9/10/2021 11:52 AM, mike tancsa wrote:
> On 9/10/2021 11:34 AM, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Zhenlei Huang wrote on Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:34:20 +0200 (CEST):
>>>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 5:38 AM, mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote:
>>>> default            10.255.255.1       UGS         6   1500       igb0
>>>> default            10.1.0.1           UGS        17   1500      tun10
>>>>
>>>> Where as now, it doesnt seem to replace it, it seems to just add
>>>> another default route.
>>> At first glance it seems that ppp does not check existing default
>>> route before replacing it with a new one.
>> My thinking as well. Similar thing (creating kind-of an overlay network)
>> with openvpn results in a single default route - apparently the original
>> one is properly removed before adding openvpn's own default route.
>>
> One other thing I noticed is that net.route.multipath is RO on i386 but
> RW on AMD64.  Is that intentional for some reason ?
>
Actually, its neither. On my i386 image I was using an old kernel def
that didnt have

options         ROUTE_MPATH

 yet the sysctl still shows up with a value of 1

# sysctl net.route.multipath
net.route.multipath: 1
# sysctl -w net.route.multipath=0
sysctl: oid 'net.route.multipath' is read only
#

    ---Mike